An enormous "sword of Damocles" hangs over all markets now. A massive liquidity drain is underway as global QE reverses into QT and rates rise against the background of immense ubiquitous crippling debt burdens. What this means is that the biggest credit crunch of all time is bearing down on us, which will involve markets crashing in the absence of bids, serious dislocation of capital markets and out of control interest rates.
This is probably the high point for Trump's presidency as the stock market enjoys its final "swansong rally" ahead of the crash, buoyed up the last of the stock buybacks before rising rates choke them off, and the dumbest of the dumb money who think that because the market has been in an uptrend for years it's going to continue.
The Fed has been playing a stealth game for a long time now, gradually but steadily raising rates and hoping that the market won't notice, and also furtively offloading its Treasury hoard, and other central banks are following the Fed's lead and doing likewise. The liquidity that drove the massive bubbles in real estate and stock markets is being pulled. That must inevitably lead to these markets dropping, and we are already seeing the start of it with the Emerging Markets plunging and hitherto red hot real estate markets cooling. When punters realize that the game is over, the decline is likely to become disorderly and involve a number of crash phases.
The Fed is always behind the curve and reactive. It has been undermining the markets for over a year now with its raising of interest rates and now QT, so when the markets buckle and cave in, it won't be "something out of the blue" or an "Act of God" as the mainstream media will inevitably portray it; it is eminently predictable, and slated to happen soon. The reason that the Fed and other central banks are raising rates and withdrawing liquidity is that they know there is another mammoth crisis looming, and they are scrambling to buffer themselves ahead of it, by giving themselves "wiggle room" to lower rates, and scaling back their massive holdings of Treasury paper, etc. The trouble is that it's a very delicate balancing act, and they are inevitably overplaying their hand to the extent that their actions will bring about the crisis that they are seeking to avoid, or at least get ahead of.
When you get up in the morning, you know that no matter how bright and strong the sun is around midday, night must later follow. In the same way bull markets are followed by bear markets, with the consolidation and contraction in the bear market phase of the market cycle being necessary to strip out excess and waste and cull the weak and inefficient. What has happened in recent years is that central banks and governments have intervened with their liquidity injections to artificially extend the bull market—a bear market should have started several years back—it is like a guy who has just finished a marathon being pumped with drugs and told to run another 10 miles. What this means is that when the bear market eventually does hit, it arrives like a category 5 hurricane, which is actually what is called for now given the monstrous debt bubbles that have been inflated to gigantic proportions by all this relentless money pumping.
Since what they have done in recent years amounts to pure lunacy according to normal criteria, we must ask ourselves "Why did they do it?" The answer is twofold. The voting masses are economically infantile and reward politicians who give them what they want—what they want is endless prosperity and they will vote out any politician who threatens to inflict austerity on them, even if it's for their own good. Second, the ZIRP policies of recent years have allowed for a massive transfer of wealth from the masses, the middle and lower classes, to the elites and super wealthy. The way it works is this: while the little folk continue to pay usurious interest rates to borrow money, the 1% pay almost nothing, borrow wads of cash and turn round and speculate in real estate, stock markets and other things like collectibles, driving huge bubbles in these markets, and then ideally cash out before the crash.
Now, you might say, when the Fed and other central banks realize that they have pulled the plug on the markets with their liquidity drain, won't they simply reverse course to stabilize the markets and pump them up again. Yes, of course they will, but by then it will be too late, as a self-feeding liquidation cycle will be going full bore, and any changes they make will need time to take effect. However, what will happen soon after they reverse course is that the dollar will suddenly find it has no wind in its sails, and gold and silver will skyrocket at the prospect of an unprecedented new round of QE that will have to be of staggering proportions to stabilize the ship, and will set us on the course to hyperinflation. This will be the point at which hapless citizens start to realize that what happens in Venezuela doesn't necessarily stay in Venezuela.
With a monstrous liquidity crunch bearing down on us, you don't have to be a genius to work out what will happen to commodities. Look at 2008 as a dry run for what's coming. Basically anything that can be sold for cash will be, and that will include commodities. It will only be when the central banks and governments reverse course into mega QE that commodities will quickly reverse and soar, especially the precious metals. Now we will look at some commodity charts to see how things are shaping up and to figure out what to expect. First though, we will go back to school with a review of what happened to commodities in 2008, as our example of what to expect, knowing that this time it should be worse.
We'll start with the general CRB commodity index, which has a big oil component, where we see on the chart for the 2008 crash that it got more than cut in half during 2008 and going into 2009. Not a great performance and the clearest of indications about what we can expect to see when the building liquidity crisis hits.
As for oil itself its decline during the 2008 crash was of a truly shocking magnitude, even with the benefit of 10 years' hindsight—after all, oil is supposed to be the "lifeblood" of the modern world, is it not?
How does the drop in commodities back then relate to what has happened since and up to now? To see that we now look at a 14-year chart for the CRB index. After the 2008–2009 crash, the index recovered when the ship was stabilized after the crash by money pumping and bounced back, but then look what happened: in marked contrast to many other assets like real estate and stocks, commodities went into a severe bear market starting in 2011 and have never really recovered.
Why is that? The reason is that while successive QE programs created a lot of cash for the 1% to go on speculative binges, they did little for the real economy, which has largely languished, hence the flaccid demand for commodities. This is why real unemployment in the U.S., as distinct from false government data, is something near 20%. For the true data on things like this go to John Williams' Shadowstats.com. It is widely thought that commodities hit a final low early in 2016 but on this chart the subsequent recovery looks weak and insipid compared to the plunge that preceded it. What it looks like in fact is a bearish Rising Wedge, and if this is what it is then a breakdown into another dramatic plunge lies ahead of us, which of course fits with our forecast for a severe credit crunch.
Thus, we should not be taken in by the CRB breaking out into a new intermediate uptrend yesterday, as shown on its 6-month chart, even if it equals or exceeds its highs of last May.
We have mentioned that oil is a big component of the CRB and if the CRB index looks as it does, then how does the oil chart look? It too should be marking out a potentially bearish pattern should it not? It is. If we look at the latest 10-year chart for light crude we see that it is approaching the apex of a bearish Rising Wedge that is rapidly closing up and is also in a zone of strong resistance. Together these factors suggest that it will break down from the Wedge before much longer and plunge, which again accords with our forecast for a severe credit crunch, and since this credit crunch looks set to be far worse than the one in 2008, we could easily see oil drop below its early 2016 lows in the $20s, barring a major military conflict in the Mideast, of course.
The challenge for us is to make our forecasts for individual stocks, and for the precious metals sector, consistent with what is set out here. For example, we know that COTs and Hedgers' positions for silver are already very bullish by normal standards, but that won't stop it dropping further during a broad-based asset liquidation. Similarly, individual stocks in other sectors recommended on the site on their own individual merits could make sizable gains ahead of the market crash, but once it hits could get caught up in the maelstrom; it's all a question of timing.
Finally, while we can't be sure exactly when the stock market will turn tail and head south, we know that a savage bear market is drawing closer and we end with a look at a couple of many charts/indicators showing the market's condition is extreme.
First the number of indicators showing extreme pessimism and the number showing extreme optimism, is very skewed, showing that excessive optimism abounds.
Chart courtesy of sentimentrader.com
Next the ratio of Call buying to Call selling is at an extreme not seen since the year 2000.
Click on chart to pop-up a larger, clearer version.
Chart courtesy of sentimentrader.com
In addition there has been a big cluster of Hindenburg indicators in recent weeks.
Clive Maund has been president of www.clivemaund.com, a successful resource sector website, since its inception in 2003. He has 30 years' experience in technical analysis and has worked for banks, commodity brokers and stockbrokers in the City of London. He holds a Diploma in Technical Analysis from the UK Society of Technical Analysts.
[NLINSERT]Disclosure:
1) Statements and opinions expressed are the opinions of Clive Maund and not of Streetwise Reports or its officers. Clive Maund is wholly responsible for the validity of the statements. Streetwise Reports was not involved in the content preparation. Clive Maund was not paid by Streetwise Reports LLC for this article. Streetwise Reports was not paid by the author to publish or syndicate this article.
2) This article does not constitute investment advice. Each reader is encouraged to consult with his or her individual financial professional and any action a reader takes as a result of information presented here is his or her own responsibility. By opening this page, each reader accepts and agrees to Streetwise Reports' terms of use and full legal disclaimer. This article is not a solicitation for investment. Streetwise Reports does not render general or specific investment advice and the information on Streetwise Reports should not be considered a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Streetwise Reports does not endorse or recommend the business, products, services or securities of any company mentioned on Streetwise Reports.
3) From time to time, Streetwise Reports LLC and its directors, officers, employees or members of their families, as well as persons interviewed for articles and interviews on the site, may have a long or short position in securities mentioned. Directors, officers, employees or members of their immediate families are prohibited from making purchases and/or sales of those securities in the open market or otherwise from the time of the interview or the decision to write an article, until one week after the publication of the interview or article.
Charts provided by the author.
CliveMaund.com Disclosure:
The above represents the opinion and analysis of Mr Maund, based on data available to him, at the time of writing. Mr. Maund's opinions are his own, and are not a recommendation or an offer to buy or sell securities. Mr. Maund is an independent analyst who receives no compensation of any kind from any groups, individuals or corporations mentioned in his reports. As trading and investing in any financial markets may involve serious risk of loss, Mr. Maund recommends that you consult with a qualified investment advisor, one licensed by appropriate regulatory agencies in your legal jurisdiction and do your own due diligence and research when making any kind of a transaction with financial ramifications. Although a qualified and experienced stock market analyst, Clive Maund is not a Registered Securities Advisor. Therefore Mr. Maund's opinions on the market and stocks can only be construed as a solicitation to buy and sell securities when they are subject to the prior approval and endorsement of a Registered Securities Advisor operating in accordance with the appropriate regulations in your area of jurisdiction.
